Ancestry.com:
Good: my new special library card gives me free access to ancestry.com at the Special Collections Library for genealogy research. Bad: Access to ancestry.com is available only on one computer, and it's almost always in use. Worse: When I was finally able to use that computer, I had great difficulty getting the information I needed. Even when I put in a specific name and date, it gave me tons of stuff hardly even remotely related. If I put in Max Stein, died Texas, 1889, why does it give me pages of people named Stein from all different dates, from Kentucky, Ohio, New Jersey... I need a tutorial.
flash drive vs. printing
Another researcher told me late in the day that if I bring my flash drive (removable), I can "print" directly to it instead of on the printer and paying 15 cents a copy. However, I was warned to watch out for viruses, since I would be plugging it into a public machine. I didn't have my flash drive with me. Total for the day: $1.35, not counting the six copies I went off and left at the library and will have to go back to pick up or reprint tomorrow. Dang it.
lies caught by newspaper microfilm archives!
I'm hot on the trail of an unsuspected additional marriage of someone who, for the time being, shall remain nameless. I found some records, some references, a newspaper tidbit in the "personal page" (society column) of the newspaper. But when I looked at the microfilm of the newspaper on that important wedding date, it was illegible. It's barely readable, and only that because I know what names I'm looking for. My next effort will be to "print" it onto my flash drive and then see if it can be digitally enhanced to bring the print up. Plan B would be to visit the main library to see if their microfilm copy is any clearer. The fascinating thing was that she subsequently lied to a census worker and said she'd only had two marriages. We suspect husband No. 3 didn't know about husband No. 2, and husband No. 3 was in the room when the census worker asked the questions. Obviously, husband No. 3 didn't read the back issues of the newspapers like I did.